Natural disasters have caused nearly 200 billion dollars in global infrastructure losses every year for the past 15 years. A recent Deloitte report warns that this figure could almost double by 2050.
The good news is that advances in AI, particularly in predictive resilience technology, could prevent up to 15 percent of these losses. That translates to as much as 70 billion dollars saved by mid-century. For those committed to global resilience, this is a pivotal moment to rethink how we prepare for and respond to disasters.
AI is no longer just a buzzword. It is becoming a core capability for cities, utilities, and infrastructure operators to plan, respond, and recover from crises. Deloitte’s research points to three critical stages where AI can deliver measurable impact:
Many regions still face infrastructure gaps, limited funding, fragmented governance, and siloed data systems. Security concerns also remain a major challenge. That is why collaboration is essential. At the EIS Council, our mission is to bring together governments, utilities, academia, and the private sector to close these gaps and strengthen resilience worldwide.
As Jennifer Steinmann, Deloitte Global Sustainability Business Leader, explains, “Investing in AI can help deliver less frequent or shorter power outages, faster system recovery after storms, or fewer damaged or non-usable roads and bridges.”
The report also warns that climate change is likely to increase both the frequency and intensity of severe weather events, making the case for predictive resilience even stronger. Storms such as tropical cyclones, tornadoes, thunderstorms, hailstorms, and blizzards already account for the largest share of infrastructure losses because of their high frequency, wide reach, and growing intensity.
One of the most innovative tools in predictive resilience today is Ginom, a real-time, multi-sector resilience simulation platform developed with the support of the EIS Council. Ginom models interconnected infrastructure, supply chains, and resources, providing a realistic, evolving picture of how a crisis might unfold across multiple sectors.
What sets Ginom apart is that it does not require every organization to share sensitive data into a central database. Instead, it links existing sector-specific simulations into one secure, coordinated framework. This allows operators to:
Ginom’s agent-based modeling, resource flow tracking, and multi-day crisis simulations give decision-makers the situational awareness they need when time is short and stakes are high. It is already being used to model complex scenarios such as large-scale power outages, fuel shortages, water system disruptions, and extreme weather events.
By integrating Ginom into preparedness planning, organizations can test “what if” scenarios in a safe environment, refine their response strategies, and coordinate more effectively across sectors.

To maximize the value of AI and predictive resilience technologies, organizations can:
Predictive resilience is no longer optional. It is becoming the backbone of how we prepare, respond, and recover from disasters. By combining AI-powered planning tools with innovative platforms like Ginom and fostering collaboration across sectors, we can significantly reduce the damage and disruption caused by tomorrow’s disasters.
A cyber incident disrupts an energy operator. Power loss affects mobile networks and digital services. Emergency teams struggle to coordinate, while transport delays hold up fuel and repair crews. This is how cascading crises develop: a disruption that begins in one system spreads through the services that depend on it. This is the interconnected threat […]
On 12 May 2017, hospital staff across England reached for patient records and found locked screens instead. The risk wasn’t new. Neither were many of the vulnerabilities exposed by the crises that followed. We have accumulated years of reports, inquiries, and recommendations on how to protect critical infrastructure. Yet the distance between identifying a risk […]
When temperatures rise, the first concern is usually public health. That is understandable. Extreme heat can put lives at risk, especially for older adults, outdoor workers, medically vulnerable communities, and people without reliable access to cooling. But heat also tests the systems behind daily life. Electric grids face higher cooling demand. Hospitals may see more […]